Iām hoping for this feature too.
It would be great if turning off Screen Time Access for Opal in settings required a separate passcode. For example, it could require the Screen Time passcode that can be set up for Appleās Screen Time restrictions.
Currently, it requires the device passcode which is flawed because it means whoever is using the device with Opal installed can always turn off the restrictions.
Try having a long password for your Iphone and make sure the touch ID option is disabled for this app. This way the password will be too long for you to remember.
Unfortunately this wouldnāt solve the problem, because youād still need to know the device password to be able to unlock and use the device. So even if the password is long, youād still have to know it to use the device and therefore youād still be able to turn off Opalās āScreen Time Accessā.
Thatās why I think it would be best for the setting to be locked behind a separate password. It would make sense for this to be the Screen Time passcode. Many people use the Screen Time passcode to self impose device restrictions by having a trusted friend/partner set it. They can still unlock and use the device using the device password but cannot bypass the Screen Time restrictions because they are locked behind a passcode only their trusted friend knows.
I see what you are saying, but I donāt think having a separate password on Opal is going to help you and I will explain why. Their are two ways that you can get around the Opal restrictions during a deep focus session. The first way is to turn off screen time and then delete the app. This is probably the easiest way because you only need a 4 digit password. I do agree that having a trusting friend or family member set the pass code for you is a good idea. The second way to get around the Opal app is to disable Apps with Screen time access. If you go to screen time and look for the setting that says apps with screen time access and turn it off, then by default it is going to ask for your iPhone password. Having a separate password for Opal would prompt you for a password if you tried to open the Opal app, but if you went to Apps with screen time access then Apple is going to ask you for your Iphone password. Iām pretty sure their is nothing that Opal could do about this because they have to work within Apple strict guidelines and restrictions. Having a separate password would help you during a normal focus session because now you would need a separate password just to open the Opal App and you wouldnāt be able to edit or cancel your session though the Opal app.
You can have Face ID on to unlock your phone, but have Face ID turned off for the Opal app. You go to Face ID & Password under settings and turn on Phone unlock, then select other apps and you will see an option that says Family Controls Authentication UI, turn Face ID off. This way you can unlock your phone easily with Face ID, but if you try to disable the app by going to screen time access you will be required to put in your long password. If you feel like your going to cave and enter your password to disable Opal you can always enter the wrong password really quick a few times and now you will be locked out of your phone for a min. Try it again and it goes to 5 min. You will then be required to unlock your phone with a really long password.
Right, so what Iām suggesting is that when you go to Settings and try to turn off an app in āApps with Screen Time Accessā, it should require a different password to the device password for the reasons explained above. It would make sense to be the Screen Time passcode as Apple already supports this for applying device restrictions that the device owner canāt bypass.
This is indeed part of the way the Screen Time API currently works that is up to Apple. But it is a fundamental flaw that prevents apps like Opal from allowing userās to self impose device restrictions in that way they can with Appleās Built In Screen Time Restrictions. So it was worth raising to Opal to make them aware of the issue, so they can hopefully also discuss this with Apple as one of the biggest users of their Screen Time API.
Unfortunately, using Face ID but not knowing your device password would not work as a solution, because the device periodically requests the device password to unlock it (and when you restart the device).
Hi @here this is a really insightful conversation, and thank you for sharing these thoughts. We donāt have a clear solution and your ideas are great.
@Opal_User_28343 you are correct that this is great feedback for Apple, and we will share it with them. We have 74 open tickets with them about the API 
so we have to be patient but this is spot on.
Another way we are thinking is a point system that rewards / penalizes you on your journey to Focus. When you turn off screen time permissions, you would get a penalty. This will only work of course if there is real value in the rewards that you get. We are thinking about this.
Thanks Kenneth, appreciate all the work you and your team are putting in. Glad to hear youāre working with Apple on improvements! Looking forward to all future developments of Opal.
I think being able to self impose restrictions tailored to an individualās needs is one of the most important new directions for the digital world. After such a longer period of tech companies having free rein to build addictive and always available products, there is such a need to be able to counter them in ways that donāt require will power.
It seems more dangerous to allow apps that profit on (getting and keeping) my attention to run endlessly on my phone, then it is to let Opal (an app that tries to help me keep my sanity) possibly have access to my information. The difference is, one type of app is trying to take away years of my life and get me so wrapped up in consumerism that I donāt even know who I am or what I want anymoreā¦ the other is trying to give me back years of my life and save me money and peace of mind by allowing me to focus on whatās in my present reality.
I think you may have just read the title here rather than the first post. They are saying it is a problem that you can easily turn off Opalās āApps with Screen Time Accessā in the Settings app, which reverts any blocks you set up.
Thanks for your feedback @here, I think itās on us to create an incentive for everyone to keep screen time permissions active for Opal. Weāre working on it. Any ideas of how we could do that are welcome!
Iām also looking for a solution to prevent me from disabling screen time restrictions 
(@kenneth messaged you on Twitter about this in Dec)
Hi all,
I love the app In every way and I think itās great the only issue I have is when you go to screen time section you can turn off the āapps with screen time accessā. Is there anyway I could remove this so I canāt turn the app off, itās an easy way to get around the app thanks.
I just noticed, unfortunately, that it is possible to disable opalās blocking by simply going to the screen time app and toggling off Opalās screen time access. This merely requires FaceID, not the screen time passcode.
Is it possible to prevent this? Including using content and privacy restrictions?
My partner has my screen time passcode so I canāt just turn off features like downtime. So I could do the same with content and privacy restrictions if that helps.
If it isnāt possible, this is yet another incredibly frustrating Apple limitation on screen time that makes it basically impossible to set hard limits on your own app usage at a granular levelā¦
I discovered a workaround for opal. I wonāt describe it since it defeats the great work of the app. Is there a way to prevent changing features in settings?
Iāve encountered the same issue/challenge. It sucks because, for me, Opalās primary value-add is how draconian and un-cancellable it can be. The Deep Focus protection has helped to enormously combat my impulsivity, time-blindness & nonstop scrolling. I hate that I can now easily undo its action mechanism (via Settings, etc.).
Is there any way we can make it far more difficult to turn off Opal?
What if we imposed a ācostā to turning off screen time settings?
For example, when you turn it back on and want to use Opal again:
Would love some feedback @here
Thanks for touching base on this @kenneth! As @Raj_Persaud said, āOpalās primary value-add is how draconian and un-cancellable it can beā.
I personally donāt want to pay an extra fee and donāt care about losing milestones. I just want Opal to be what it is, a protection against myself: this would literally give me back years of my life. The best alternative there is to Opal is switching back to a 3310 
Iād be open to the financial penalty but ask that you try a solution that doesnāt cost additional. I love Opal and appreciate asking for feedback.
@kenneth what if a buddy system was incorporated. Ie. someone you trust has a passcode that must be entered to toggle Opal screen time access on off.
Another option would be preventing the user from opening iPhone āsettingsā or specifically the āscreen timeā section for X period of time.
Or maybe if opal could temporary change your iPhone password so you canāt toggle off screen time and then change it back?
I am having the same problem as everyone else and really need this fixed lol I wish I didnāt know how this loophole. Opal was doing wonders for me before this.
PLS HELP H
Kenneth,
Iām actually a huge fan of this approach. Iāve heavily researched neurodivergence &, in particular ADHD (I also suffer from it). I know that for a sizable segment of the population, motivation to NOT do something comes more from a fear of the penalty/toll incurred than from the positive aspirational notions of who they can be/what they can achieve if they adhere to something. Iām not saying these positive aspirational ideas donāt exist nor factor into decision-making & observed behavior, but rather, at the end of the day, itās the fear of penalty that drives them to take action (or inaction in terms of not breaking a rule). I think paying an extra fee would be the most draconian of these measures and I absolutely support it existing, but perhaps we can reserve it for a tier of behavior/specific time-slot that is most important to the individual user, i.e. the user intentionally sets up that penalty to go into effect should he/she fail.
I also support there being secondary or smaller penalties. I think feeling the pain of a cost or something that matters being lost adds more real-life implication to the user and advances some of the gamification that research shows tends to motivate users.
For comparisonās sake, some of my favorite & most effective other productivity tools operate around this concept of real-world penalty should you renege on your commitments. They also have a hack-proof independent means of verifying that you did indeed stick to your pledge/tasks. These tools include Beeminder, Forfeit & Stickk. I think thereās a reason why these tools have attracted sizable user-bases and I can see Opal succeeding in its mission by engineering reward/penalty systems like these.